home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19970104-19970326
/
000236_news@columbia.edu _Thu Feb 13 22:41:33 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Return-Path: <news@columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.35.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA05981
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 22:41:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA04834
for kermit.misc@watsun; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 22:41:31 -0500 (EST)
Path: news.columbia.edu!panix!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!140.142.64.3!news.u.washington.edu!u.washington.edu!apardoe
From: "Andrew J. Pardoe" <apardoe@u.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc,comp.os.os2.comm
Subject: Re: Problem with OS/2 Warp 4.0 and C-kermit
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:07:27 -0800
Organization: University of Washington
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <Pine.OS2.3.95.970213164459.661C-100000@neko.dental.washington.edu>
References: <5du5ck$vlu@news.umbc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: neko.dental.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <5du5ck$vlu@news.umbc.edu>
X-X-Sender: apardoe@mailer5.u.washington.edu
Xref: news.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:6577 comp.os.os2.comm:11559
FWIW, I've been using the new Kermit/2 (or Kermit 95 for OS/2, whatever)
for quite a few months now and have never experienced any lockups at all.
During the betas I got a couple of traps but K2 never stopped the OS.
(I've had no problems since the release code, BTW.) You may consider
upgrading: it's an entirely new product so the behaviour at that level
could be quite different.
I'm running mostly on a 12MB '386/33 over 50 hours per week if that gives
any indication of how well-behaved K2 (and OS/2) is.
I realize this isn't exactly what you were asking for but it is a viable
(some would say attractive) solution.
Andrew Pardoe